RSML vs its alternatives¶
There are multiple alternatives to RSML that provide its base funcionality, each with their own benefits and drawbacks. Below is a comparison table of RSML against its alternatives, showcasing why RSML is the best choice for machine-dependent logic evaluation in your projects.
-
RSML v2.0.0+ (Modern)
Made in C#
Logic-first design
Pattern matching via simple, fresh syntax
Command-line Interface
C# and Python support
Exposes a C ABI
Organized, easy-to-use API
Open Source (MIT License)
Cross-platform logic evaluation
Extremely Performant
-
RSML v1.x.x (Legacy)
Made in C#
Logic-first design
Pattern matching (RSML v1.x.x uses Regex, which is not that simple and slows down evaluation time)
Command-line Interface with limited support for RSML's API
C# and Python support
Does not expose a C ABI
The API is not property organized and is confusing for beginners
Open Source (MIT License)
Cross-platform logic evaluation
Slower and allocates a lot more memory
-
MF's CrossRoad Solution (Deprecated)
Made in Python 3
Logic-first design
Pattern matching via unnecessarily complicated syntax (MFRoad's syntax is extremely strict, not allowing for spacing and the lack of delimiting on strings feels off to beginners)
Command-line Interface
Python support only
Does not expose a C ABI
The API is incredibly limited
Open Source
Cross-platform logic evaluation
Performance untested
-
Scripting Languages (such as Python)
You can use any language you want...
...but most times, you'll end up having to pack a whole interpreter when that shouldn't be needed for a simple decision on what logic path to take.
In summary, as shwon above, RSML v2.0.0+ stands out as the most modern, efficient, and user-friendly solution for machine-dependent logic evaluation compared to its alternatives. Its logic-first design, simple pattern matching syntax, cross-platform support, and high performance make it the ideal choice for developers looking to implement robust logic evaluation in their applications.